Confusion Reigns with Hillsborough Transit Tax as Public Loses Faith


Stacy White


By Sharon Calvert, from Eye on Tampa Bay

The All for Transportation (AFT) 30-year $16 billion transit tax referendum has created mass confusion, with the public questioning the viability of the program, the veracity of its advocates, and the motives of the corporate players and media entities that vociferously supported the plan.
Hillsborough County Commissioner Stacy White’s lawsuit challenging the legality of the tax hike has brought new illuminating facts into the public arena.

Local media, AFT, some county commissioners, and spokespeople for profiteers were falsely asserting that White’s lawsuit delays spending the tax proceeds.  Nothing could be further from the truth.

At a Jan. 24 county commission meeting, White cited the charter amendment language that debunks the false narrative promoted by AFT, the Tampa Bay Times, developers who stand to profit, and hired stooges passed off as “spokespeople.”

The amendment language states that no AFT sales tax proceeds collected in 2019 can be expended until January 2020.  All of the agencies receiving the tax proceeds must submit their spending plans to unelected bureaucrats appointed to the Independent Oversight Committee (IOC).  IOC approval is required before the agency can spend the proceeds in the following calendar year.

The video and captioning of county commission meeting is found here. In the video, White’s comments begin at about 22:34 or about four minutes from the end. A copy of White’s comments from the closed caption transcript can be found here.

White cited Section 11.06 of AFT’s charter amendment.  The AFT charter amendment can be found here.


Importantly, White discovered that Section 11.06 was omitted from the official County Charter updated with the AFT tax hike charter amendment language after the election. This is a critical section of the amendment that dictates what must occur to spend the tax funds and when they can be spent.

Below is the County Charter with the AFT charter amendment that was on the county’s website January 24, 2019 but without Section 11.06 of the charter amendment.

County Charter missing Section 11.06

The County has since inserted the missing Section 11.06 into the official County Charter.

Many questions need to be answered.  How did the key omission occur?  Were multiple versions of the charter amendment floating around the county? Were there versions that excluded Section 11.06 or excluded any other section?

The local media buzz (see links below) over the last few weeks claimed White’s lawsuit was delaying the Hillsborough Area Regional Transportation Authority (HART) from ordering 30 buses to be delivered by December and delaying the ordering of eight electric buses at a cost of $10 million.

County commissioners Kimberly Overman and Pat Kemp both supported the AFT tax hike and were concerned about the lawsuit delaying transit spending by HART. Kemp even wanted the county to hand HART half of the county’s Community Investment Tax (CIT) reserves, $10 million, to buy the eight costly electric buses – for the two percent who use transit in Hillsborough County.

Apparently these commissioners were not concerned about much needed projects on roads that 98 percent in Hillsborough County use everyday. None of the 2019 tax proceeds being collected now can be spent on any road purposed projects until 2020.  Were the voters aware of this?

Jeff Seward, the interim CEO of HART, said its attorney, David Smith, recently informed the HART Board of AFT’s timing on the spending of the tax proceeds.

Smith sent his memo to HART on January 24, 2019, immediately after Commissioner White disclosed the actual language in Section 11.06 of AFT’s charter amendment.

Smith’s memo states:

Memo from HART attorney to HART Board
January 24, 2019
(click to enlarge)

This confirms some of the powers AFT specifically gave to its “Independent Oversight Committee” (IOC) who are unelected bureaucrats accountable to no one. The IOC can approve or disapprove plans; they can delay any changes to a plan that an agency requests.

Seward said he that neither he nor any members of the HART Board were aware of Section 11.06 and the timing considerations.  This was confirmed by a HART Board member.

If county commissioners and others from the agencies receiving AFT’s tax proceeds were misled, misinformed or simply unaware of Section 11.06, voters were as well.

This is just one section of AFT’s charter amendment no one understood.  There are certainly other sections of AFT’s charter amendment that are ambiguous or misleading.

And it appears that AFT did not understand their own charter amendment.

After Seward discovered the missing Section 11.06, he found it odd that after the election,  Christina Barker, AFT spokesperson and employee of developer Jeff Vinik, wanted to know how quickly HART could put new services on the street. Of course those new services require the tax proceeds.

AFT spokesperson Brian Willis told Tampa Bay Business Journal “Commissioner White’s lawsuit is costing taxpayers more money while delaying the improvements needed to save lives and prevent accidents throughout our community.”

Willis should read his own charter amendment.

The 16-member IOC has not been created, no agency has a plan to deliver to the IOC, and no tax proceeds collected in 2019 can be spent until 2020.

If AFT does not understand its charter amendment, voters could not have as well.

But as AFT spokesperson Christina Barker publicly stated just days before the election:

Our story is one of a few people who got together. We were writing a charter amendment over drinks.

Just as drinking while driving is dangerous, drinking while lawmaking can be lethal for all of us.

Unfortunately, the truth is unfolding after the election.


Comments are closed.