Vinik Lackey Hudson Acceded Transit Scheme Is “Fraudulent”


An arrogant Tyler Hudson was aware of statute violations and ballot language problems well ahead of the November referendum

By Jim Bleyer

In a text to a Hillsborough County voter two weeks before the November transit tax referendum,  Jeff Vinik pointman Tyler Hudson virtually admitted that the now exposed scam is fraudulent.

Once more Hudson, in responding to Charlotte Greenbarg’s accusation that promoters of the Vinik Tax were disingenuous, did so openly, arrogantly, sophomorically, and without a shred of remorse.

He replied to Greenbarg with a meme of a toothy canine and the words, “Hehe.” (See below).  The connotation is clear: “So what?  What are you gonna do about it?”

Greenbarg is a prominent conservative activist and a member of No Tax for Tracks, a group dedicated to defeating efforts to foist a multi-billion light rail system anywhere in Tampa Bay.  Replying to a promotional text from Hudson, she challenged the veracity of tax proponents and the tax “scheme” itself.

Vinik, a former hedge fund manager and owner of the NHL’s Tampa Bay Lightning, poured millions promoting the one percent transit tax.  His $3 billion Water Street Tampa development is drowning and the multi-billion tax windfall is seen as a Vinik bailout.

Local wags refer to the woefully behind schedule downtown project as “Underwater Street Tampa.”

The transit tax is tied up in litigation.  There are two cases: one brought by Hillsborough County Commissioner Stacy White; the other by a private citizen.

John Cimino of Temple Terrace filed the second complaint as a class-action lawsuit. Cimino is representing any Hillsborough County resident who has paid the surtax as part of a purchase made in 2019. That would be just about anyone over the age of eight.   In other words, a large majority of the approximately 1.4 million people living in Hillsborough County.

Unlike White’s lawsuit, Cimino is asking a judge to issue an injunction stopping the collection of the tax and to refund taxpayers.  Another key issue: the referendum calls for an “Independent Oversight Committee” to parcel out the billions.  So far, all the appointees are friendly to Vinik and his allies.

The lawsuits have ramifications much bigger and broader beyond Hillsborough County.  Can anyone—specifically a committee of unelecteds—appropriate sales tax proceeds in Florida? 

The transit tax, if upheld by the judicial system, would make Hillsborough County the highest sales tax county in Florida at 8.5 percent.  The levy already has adversely impacted the hospitality industry and retailers stocking big ticket items.

The tax hits low and fixed income families hardest.  The light rail spur from the University of South Florida to downtown Tampa—proposed by Vinik and his gang—would displace a significant portion of East Tampa’s minority community.

Opponents of the ballot measure observed from the get-go that it was rife with violations of Florida statutes and ballot language problems.  None of this was reported by the debt-laden Tampa Bay Times, dependent on Vinik and his allies for financing to keep it afloat.

The Tampa Bay Business Journal and local electronic news entities were equally culpable in keeping Hillsborough voters in the dark.  Vinik spends millions in advertising not only for the Lightning, but for any event held in Amalie Arena.

Hudson, who held the title of AFT chairman, knew about these potential legal snags at least as early as July 5, four months before the referendum, according to Tom Rask of the Tampa Bay Guardian. That is the day the Guardian asked Hudson about these issues in an e-mail. The Hillsborough county attorney’s office was copied so that the questions to AFT would be in the public record.

In that same e-mail, AFT was asked if it had obtained “a legal opinion on its petition before it started gathering signatures.” Despite repeated e-mails and calls to Hudson and his assistant, there was no response, Rask reported.

Hudson and AFT thus forged ahead, spending $700,000 of Jeff Vinik’s money and a total of $4 million on their tax hike effort, even though this substantive legal question was raised well before the measure was placed on the ballot.

Now the farcical tax measure faces two court challenges.  If the courts find the tax violates the state constitution, there is no mechanism to determine who paid how much, putting the funds already collected in limbo.


Greenbarg informed Hillsborough County Commissioners of Hudson’s damning text, both before and after the November election.




Comments are closed.